Pests and diseases of forestry in New Zealand
KEEPING AN EYE ON OUR PLANTATION FORESTS
From Biosecurity 89, February 2009
To provide an additional line of defence, the forest industry, through
the New Zealand Forest Owners' Association (NZFOA), runs a Forest
Health Surveillance System (FHS) across its members' more than a
million hectares of plantation forest. This scheme has been operating
for more than 50 years, although adjustments have been made to the
design and implementation as additional knowledge has come to hand.
What is the FHS?

|
| Close inspection of foliage is
required to find cryptic disease organisms. Photo courtesy SPS
Biosecurity Ltd. |
The FHS is implemented on an annual basis and tendered, through the
NZFOA, to forest health providers. SPS Biosecurity Ltd currently
provides the bulk of the service, and a smaller area is surveyed by
Baigent Pest Control. Forest health providers are required to conduct
aerial and ground surveys, followed up by more intensive plot
investigations where results from aerial surveys warrant it. All staff
are well trained in forest biosecurity investigations and provide a
dedicated service to the industry.
Increasing attention is paid to what are termed "High Risk Forest
Sites". These sites are where there is considered an increased chance
that new organisms could be found. These are often associated with risk
pathways such as machinery movement, heavy industry and recreation.
A critical component of the FHS is the collection and diagnosis of
suspicious samples collected in the field. These are sent to the Crown
Research Institute Scion, where they are quickly analysed to determine
if there is a potential threat to the forest plantation. With the
development and introduction of molecular techniques, this service is
becoming very sophisticated, not unlike that provided for crime scene
investigations.
The FHS is funded by forest owners through a voluntary levy, which also
provides funding to cover research and the administration of industry
forest health activities. While the cost appears nominal on a per
hectare basis, the amount becomes significant across the
million-hectare estate of NZFOA members.
Who are the forest health providers?
The main forest health provider is SPS Biosecurity Ltd. The directors
(Paul Bradbury and Brent Rogan) have each been involved in the
quarantine, forestry and biosecurity fields for over 20 years and have
worked for a range of government agencies, private companies and
research organisations. In mid-2007 they saw an opportunity for a
specialist private provider of environmental and biosecurity services
and established SPS Biosecurity Ltd. Mr Bradbury and Mr Rogan are well
supported by a highly experienced team of well-qualified forest health
professionals.
As well as conducting the bulk of the FHS work, SPS Biosecurity staff
are also involved in the MAF-operated High Risk Site Surveillance,
along with other forest health and biosecurity operations. Thus they
are able to provide a sound overview of what is being done throughout
New Zealand in biosecurity surveillance.
What do they find?

|
Beating
a pine tree to gather insect samples.
Photo courtesy SPS Biosecurity Ltd. |
The forest health providers are specifically looking for new and
potentially dangerous pests and diseases that have been introduced to
New Zealand's plantation forest estate. However, the expectation and
hope is that few, if any, will be found. To date this has been the
case, although the plantation forests do have several well-established
diseases that are monitored, such as Dothistroma and Cyclaneusma needle
casts. The forest health providers report on the extent and intensity
of these forest health issues to the respective forest owners and may
also provide additional information on other aspects of forest
condition, such as nutrition and snow damage, as required.
How well does it work?
The NZFOA conducts periodic audits of the FHS to ensure it is working
as designed. In November 2007, it commissioned a major external review
by two overseas experts: Dr Andrew Liebhold, a research entomologist
with the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service
in Virginia, and Dr Brenda Callan, a pathologist with the Canadian
Forest Service in Victoria, BC.
They concluded: "Overall, we found the FHS system to be well-conceived,
valuable to the New Zealand forest industry and generally well
executed. The program deserves commendation as part of a progressive
approach to forest biosecurity that exceeds the sophistication level
attained by forest health surveillance programs elsewhere in the world."
The reviewers also recognised the role the Government played in
providing a "world leading" level of biosecurity effort, which had
resulted in the exclusion of many serious pests, and the forest
industry's foresight for "advancing a highly progressive approach to
alien pest exclusion".

|
| The
New Zealand forest industry would be devastated if a pest reached
epidemic levels similar to the
Mountain Pine Beetle in Canada. Photo courtesy Natural Resources
Canada. |
Much of the credit for the success of the forest surveillance programme
could be attributed to the forest health providers' staff. "These
individuals are the 'eyes' of the program and their skill, dedication
and hard work are evident, as is the very competent diagnostic service
provided by NZFRI (the New Zealand Forest Research Institute, Scion) in
analysing field samples. Accomplishing this goal is no simple matter
given that causal organisms may often be cryptic and difficult to
identify (e.g., species that are new to science or previously not
associated with a particular host or disease complex)."
Despite the top marks scored from the review, the NZFOA has made
several minor adjustments to the current system in line with the
review's recommendations. In particular, increased attention is being
focused on high-risk sites, where there is a greater likelihood of new
pests and diseases being found.
How does the FHS work with MAF?
The FHS system is closely linked to MAF biosecurity operations, and new
organisms identified are recorded in the MAF biosecurity database.
Additionally, the FHS High Risk Forest Site network is modelled after
MAF's High Risk Site network, and similar investigative procedures are
used for both.
There has been a long-standing partnership between the forest industry
and MAF to protect New Zealand's plantation and native forests from
biosecurity threats. To date, this has worked well and the most
damaging agents have been excluded.
Bill Dyck, science and technology
broker and NZFOA Forest Health Administrator