Pests and diseases of forestry in New Zealand
BIOSECURITY SURVEILLANCE FOR TOURIST RISK SITES
From Biosecurity 89, February 2009
MAF Biosecurity New Zealand (MAFBNZ)
has taken a Department of Conservation (DOC) biosecurity surveillance
programme and expanded it significantly to increase the protection of
New Zealand's indigenous forests from invasive pests and diseases.
New Zealanders recognise the beauty and magnificence of our native
forests and scenery. We celebrate them every year by visiting in our
hundreds of thousands, and, as their fame has spread overseas, tourists
travel from far away to visit. The introduction of new organisms, and
changes in the distribution of risk organisms already present, could
cause significant harm to our unique range of flora and fauna. Without
biosecurity surveillance of native forests, harmful organisms could
have the opportunity to go undetected for long periods.

|
Pohutukawa being inspected as part of High
Risk Site Surveillance. This location is one of many close to a New
Zealand port. Photo courtesy of SPS Biosecurity Ltd.
|
Why is there a problem?
Tourism is a recognised pathway for exotic organisms into New Zealand.
Although baggage and personal effects are inspected at ports of entry,
this is not 100 percent effective in detecting exotic organisms.
In the mid-1960s, air travellers' shoes and clothes were found to
contain fungi (65 species in one trial) that could be a potential
hazard for plants. In the early 1980s, tourists' camping gear was found
to be a prospective pathway for the invasion of pathogenic fungi and
live insects.
A major area of concern is where tourists initially camp after arriving
in New Zealand, exposing tents and other camping equipment for the
first time. Even just visiting scenic tourist spots and walking through
indigenous forests has the potential to establish exotic organisms, for
example from unclean boots, and to disperse weeds into previously clear
areas.
Some history
The risk to the indigenous estate and the risk pathways have been
recognised for many years. Out of 93 newly discovered pathogens and
pests recorded in New Zealand in the 1990s, 18 were associated with
indigenous hosts. For example, polyphagous (Latin for "eating many")
exotic moths found in Auckland in the 1990s were proven to be a
significant threat to the indigenous forests as well as plantation and
amenity trees. One, the white-spotted tussock moth, was able to live
and reproduce on native beech trees.

|
More
than 600,000 people visit Huka Falls every year – each visitor could be
a biosecurity risk.
|

|
SPS
Biosecurity Director Brent Rogan inspecting native vegetation in a
transect. Information gathered is recorded in a hand-held PDA before
being transferred to a GIS database. Photo courtesy of SPS Biosecurity
Ltd.
|
A report produced for DOC in 2000, evaluating threats to New Zealand's
indigenous forests from exotic pathogens and pests, recommended that a
structured surveillance system for indigenous forests be developed so
that limited resources could be used to look at the highest risk sites
in a way that would provide the greatest chance of detecting newly
introduced pests or diseases.
In response to the recognition of risk from tourists, DOC began
surveying the most popular first-night campsites (68 in total). The
project began in 2001, with the main objective being the early
detection of newly introduced invertebrates and diseases, and weeds
that would be harmful to New Zealand's indigenous forests.
Responsibility for this surveillance programme was transferred to the
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) on 1 July 2005, under the
re-organisation of biosecurity that gave MAF accountability for
end-to-end management of the biosecurity system.
What is MAFBNZ doing now?
The original "first-night campsites" programme initiated by DOC has now
been amalgamated with MAFBNZ's High Risk Site Surveillance programme
(HRSS) and expanded to provide wider and more risk-based coverage. The
range of risk sites surveyed and priorities for extending cover have
also been reviewed using visitor numbers provided by DOC. For example,
one of the most popular visitor areas is Huka Falls with over 600,000
visitors annually, including a significant number of overseas tourists.
Each of the selected risk sites has been carefully mapped and
inspected, with efforts now concentrated on looking for new and
significant pests. During the 2008/09 season, 130 tourist risk sites
were visited and over 380 transects intensively surveyed. While a total
of 14 samples were submitted to the Crown Research Institute Scion for
analysis, no new pests were found.
In addition to tourist risk sites, urban HRSS sites around New Zealand,
particularly including ports and airports, are inspected in the same
way.
Who does the site inspections?

|
Tourist-related
high-risk sites in mid-upper North Island. Current High Risk Site
Surveillance transects are in red and the new tourist risk sites are in
yellow.
|
AsureQuality Ltd currently manages the HRSS contract for MAFBNZ. The
main provider of field surveillance is SPS Biosecurity Ltd, whose
directors have been involved in the quarantine, forestry and
biosecurity fields for over 20 years. Many of the surveyors are
extremely well qualified and have over 40 years of experience working
in forest health and biosecurity.
What does the future hold?
In the future, risk data, such as updated tourist visitor numbers,
results of slippage surveys and border pest interceptions, will allow
improved profiling and ranking of tourist risk sites. This will allow
direct comparison of risk between different types of risk sites.
While compiling a full list of all woody, herbaceous and aquatic weeds
would be a significant undertaking, and regarded as a separate project,
there is scope as part of the HRSS programme to collect woody weed data
and record any new species without significantly increasing the work
component of the surveillance. This would allow changes in weed
composition to be measured over time, and could provide an early
warning of new invasive weed species.
Paul Stevens, Senior Adviser (Plants
Surveillance), Post Border, MAFBNZ,
paul.stevens@maf.govt.nz