|
|

|
|
About Husqvarna
The
Husqvarna Group is the world's largest producer of chainsaws,
lawn mowers and other petrol-powered garden equipment such as trimmers
and leaf blowers, as well as one of the world's largest producers
of garden tractors. Husqvarna is also one of the world's largest
producers of cutting equipment for the construction and stone industries.
The product offering comprises equipment for both consumers and
professional users.
Husqvarna Outdoor Products,
PO Box 76-437, Manukau City, Auckland
|
|
Initial spacing in radiata pine
New Zealand Tree
Grower May 2007
Wink Sutton
Recent silvicultural improvements, such as seed source – almost all
seed now comes from seed orchards – nursery practice, tree handling,
planting methods, weed control and the adoption of regimes that do not
include a production thinning, have all reduced initial stocking
levels. The initial spacing is now generally determined by how many
trees need to be planted to ensure a final crop stocking of high
quality stems, for which a ratio of three to one is usually adequate.
Such decisions may appear rational, but the thinking a century ago was
very different. The following is my understanding of the evolution of
initial spacing approaches and how initial spacing helped our
understanding of radiata pine silviculture.
Replicating nature
When the first government plantings began in the late 1890s, the
approach to initial spacing was an attempt to replicate nature.
Following European practice trees were closely planted. Although the
initial spacing could have been closer, the initial stocking adopted
was at a rate of just under 7,000 trees per hectare – which was 1.2
metres or four feet square. The theory was that if trees were planted
closely, the trees would grow straight and the lowest branches would
soon die and fall off. As in the old growth stands, such trees would
produce timber free of knots.
Most of the early plantings were with prison labour, and only a small
area could be planted because of the very high stocking, but there
would also have been early evidence that very high stocking levels
resulted in early tree mortality. By 1910 the initial spacing had been
reduced to about 3,000 trees per hectare.
Wider spacing
Soon after the large scale plantings began in the late 1920s the
initial spacing was extended to 1.8 by 2.4 metres – approximately 2,200
stems per hectare, and even to 2.4 metres square – approximately 1,700
trees per hectare. Adoption of the wider spacings was to reduce costs
and to allow a greater area to be planted with the same resources.
In the late 1930s the initial plantings were harvested. The high
initial stocking did not result in natural pruning and produced almost
no clearwood. Most of the timber sawn was full of knots, many of them
small and bark encased. If we were to produce clearwood, radiata pine
had to be artificially pruned.
In the late 1940s and early 1950s a number of initial spacing trials
were established in State forests such as Woodhill, Kaingaroa, Gwavas
and Eyrewell forests, with spacings ranging from 1.8 metres to 4.8
metres. Some trials included examples of rectangular spacing.
Evaluating spacing
When the ‘economics of silviculture’ group was established in the 1960s
I joined the group and my responsibilities included initial spacing. My
first approach was to evaluate those NZ Forest Service spacing trials.
Measurements of tree diameters, basal area and heights were straight
forward but branch measurements were not.
As it did not directly relate to log quality and was dependent on the
total number of branches, a measure of average branch size was almost
meaningless. Branch measurements were limited to the dominants and
larger co-dominants – the trees most likely to be in the final crop. A
meaningful and repeatable measure of the average branch size not only
proved difficult to relate to log quality but also
impossible to assess. Small branches were difficult to count – once
trees age small dead branches can be easily broken off or they rot and
fall off. As the size of the largest knots was important in determining
sawn timber grades, branch measurements were concentrated on the
assessment of the largest branches.
Economic evaluation of the initial spacing demonstrated the advantages
of a wide spacing. The research also demonstrated the financial
advantages of rectangular spacing – lower planting, selection and
releasing costs. But do trees planted at rectangular spacing differ in
tree form? Measurements in the spacing trials showed that rectangular
spacings were not significantly different from their square planting
equivalents. Branch sizes between the rows were no smaller than those
within the rows.
This uniform development was confirmed by measurements in an unthinned
mature radiata pine stand planted at 7.3 by 1.8 metres. The between and
within row tree diameters and average largest branch sizes were within
one percent of each other.
Initially this was a surprising result but observations in mature
radiata pine stands show that radiata pine branches have the ability to
grow towards a more open space. Not all tree species appear to have
this ability. Douglas fir branches, for example, almost always appear
to grow straight out from the stem.
How important is spacing?
Some foresters place considerable emphasis on tree spacing at planting
and at thinning for the final crop. However I am yet to be convinced
that tree spacing is important. In radiata pine the spacing can vary,
perhaps within the range of double and half the specified spacing, a
ratio of four to one, with no or little effect on tree growth or form.
My evidence is mostly circumstantial –
- The ability of radiata pine branches to bend towards a light well
- A concerted but wasted research effort trying to demonstrate that
a tree’s growth is determined by the size and closeness of its
immediate neighbours
- Observations in unthinned mature radiata stands initially planted
at 3,000 stems per hectare but with less than 10% of those trees
surviving. It was not uncommon to find two large trees just 1.8 metres
apart. There were a few examples of three large trees at the same
spacing, and I even found one example of four large trees growing at
the corners of a 1.8 metre square. If tree spacing was important there
is no way these examples could exist.
Provided the overall stocking is as specified the actual spacing of
those trees is a minor consideration. The research in the spacing
trials was an important contribution to the paper Dr Bob Fenton and I
wrote in 1968 advocating a sawlog regime that is similar to that is now
practised in many New Zealand plantations.
Wink Sutton is the Patron of the NZFFA
In his excellent 1993 Radiata Pine Growers Manual Piers MacLaren has a
very comprehensive discussion on initial spacing. Although spacing was
one of my responsibilities when I was with the economics of
silviculture team at the Forest Research Institute, I could not add
anything substantial to what Piers has written.
(top)